My good friend Carol Schillios is living on a roof for as long as it takes to raise $1 million to support women and their families in developing countries.
If we work together, each using our own voice and personal network, we can help get her off the roof in a jiffy, before she catches a deatha-cold.
Here’s an idea to help:
We each donate a dollar (or more), and perform a small act of kindness.
Tweet or update your Facebook status with your one small act, along with this link to Carol’s site http://bit.ly/qQaec and the hashtag #imupontheroof.For example: “Complimented a stranger on the subway. http://bit.ly/qQaec #imupontheroof”
Bonus: Change your Twitter location to “Up on the roof with Carol.”
The hashtag #imupontheroof is a nice way for us all to remind Carol that, although not physically, we are up there with her in thought and spirit. It’ll also help us keep up as more people tell their stories. (Click here if you’re wondering “what the heck is a hashtag?”)
Finally, encourage everyone you can to do the same by emailing, tweeting, blogging, Facebook(ing), and on and on.
Most of us are unbelievably connected and use that power to share opinions, jokes, goofy youtube videos (here’s a good one), and so on. This is an opportunity to use it for something much bigger.
Some people write. Others use mind maps. I come to conclusions by flapping my gums. I’ve learned I’m a verbal processor, and talking things out helps me form ideas. Only at the end of a conversation do I really know how I feel about the topic at hand.
But when I discuss an unprocessed idea, it rarely comes out well. The idea formation and clarification process is messy and non-linear.
What is great for organizing things in my mind is bad for my ability to communicate them. But in order to process well, I have to communicate poorly first.
If I just sit down and try to write an idea out, it rarely goes well. I end up bugging friends and family. I send it off to be critiqued at many points along the way, and generally find ways to engage any willing set of eyes and ears and mouths in dialogue about the topic.
And with that conversation comes clarity.
It’s almost a requirement that if I’m to come to a real conclusion about something, I must first bludgeon that thing (and the people in my vicinity) with waves of scatterbrained hullabaloo.
Anyone else on the same page?
I’m sure there’s some life lesson in all of this, but I’m not sure what. Let’s talk it out.
Today my mom gave me some sass about the fact that I haven’t written on here in almost a month. First of all, I didn’t even realize she read this thing unless I sent her the links. High five to that.
A couple of weeks ago, Terrell (@texast) tweeted this:
I almost tweeted something that falls in the TMI category. Decided not to, but will blog about it later! I must share. what’s wrong w/me?
I feel the same way: I can’t shake the pull to document and share. This week’s break from Twitter helped ease that knee-jerk desire to post a thing when it happens. It makes it easier to be present and enjoy that thing in the moment without worrying about how to communicate it as a digestible snack.
This bit of text from the header of Ze Frank’s blog says it well:
This is my blog. Sometimes I don’t write for a while, that usually means I’m doing something else. I didn’t forget about you though. I like you.
I do like you. When I take breaks from sharing, I start to feel like a hyperactive little kid - wiggling in my seat, ansty to ask you things and tell you what I learned today. I miss the conversation. We’ll talk soon.
Is your immediate reaction to interesting haps in your life to document and share them? If so: is that a new thing, or has it always been the case?
This week I asked my Twitter friends 1) Who their favorite jazz vocalists are and 2) What soul-crushingly beautiful music they’d recommend. Here’s what they, aka you, said:
Favorite Jazz Vocalists
• Lady Day • Nat King Cole • Frank Sinatra • Cab Calloway • Ella Fitzgerald • Louis Armstrong • Diana Krall • Mel Torme • Bill Weathers • Nina Simone • Billie Holiday • Sarah Vaughan • Bobbi Humphrey • Diana Krall • Betty Carter • Little Jimmy Scott • Madeleine Peyroux • Patricia Barber •
Soul-Crushingly Beautiful Music
• Sigur Ros • “Go Now” by the Moody Blues • “I Get Along Without You Very Well” by Carly Simon • Neko Case • Emmylou Harris • Riceboy Sleeps • “Possibly Maybe” by Björk • Other Lives • Ray LaMontagne • Neil Young • Annuals • Jeff Buckley • “Oriental Melody” and “Cool New Way” by Joe Satriani • Kings of Convenience • The Sundays • Mazzy Star • The Cure (Disintigration-era) • Leonard Cohen • Sufjan Stevens • The Sublime Goodness Mixtape 2 • Patty Griffin •
Update 7/1: I’ve added four jazz vocalists and a spelling change from @astigmatic, who let me know that, “It’s Krall, the singer, not Krull, the awesomely bad fantasy thriller from 1983.” Thanks, Aaron.
PS: Add to the list by posting your favorites in the comments.
Last week while walking through the wilds of Williamsburg, I passed this. Just like last time, it needs a caption. Bad. Please leave yours.
This round’s winning caption receives a copy of Marc Johns’ righteous book of illustrations, “Serious Drawings.”
As always, you are free to submit as many captions as your noodle can pop out. I’ll announce the winner Thursday, July, 2nd.
Update (7/2): This was a really hard decision, because there’s a ton of solid gold in the comments. Jeff Hardin takes the win with: “Prison dwarf tossing FAIL,” which actually made me spit coffee when I read it.
I wrote a song yesterday from my hotel room outside of Minneapolis. I think I’ll probably add to it, but here’s a quick-and-dirty little recording I made this morning of what it is right now. Hope you enjoy it:
In 1995 a couple of miffed Danish filmmakers got together and said, “We’re tired of the effects and novelty and plastic pizzazz of Hollywood hijacking the most important thing about film: the story.”
And so they trimmed the fat.
The two Danes were Lars von Trier and Thomas Vinterberg, and in 45 minutes they wrote the Dogme 95 Vow of Chastity, a 10-point manifesto that rejected overproduced gimmicks in favor of pure storytelling. The rules include shooting only on location with no props or sets, avoiding added sound or music, using only hand-held cameras, and filming in color with no special lighting (read the whole thing here).
In other words, von Tirier and Vinterburg believed in placing certain limitations on their work and got great results. The first of the dogme films, aka Dogme #1, Vinterberg’s “The Celebration,” demonstrated the beauty of limitation and won the Jury Prize at Cannes, along with loads of other awards.
Like von Trier and Vinterberg, we all need to embrace—and even self-impose—limitations to achieve a deeper creative focus.
Unlike our Scandinavian friends, however, we don’t have to declare all-out stylistic chastity. We can begin sketching our boundaries with a few rough outlines.