GumGum’s newfangled content licensing model

GumGum, a new way to license digital media, launched a couple of days ago:

Offline, content is licensed for a finite period of time to a predictable audience. Online, content lives forever and usage is unknown. This raises the question: How do you fairly monetize a license when circulation is unpredictable? GumGum distributes, tracks and monetizes every view a piece of content receives online. (gumgum.com)

GumGum’s licensing model makes money with CPM or ad revenue. It works like this:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Znx_VWFrHi0]

Licensing is only available for images right now, but they have plans up their sleeve for audio, video, and text. Read a more in-depth analysis on TechCrunch here.

Rejected pun-laden post title: “Will GumGum stick?”

(via fluidesign_blog)

Qtrax: Free, ad-supported music

Starting today, legal file-sharing network Qtrax is opening up access to 25,000,000 free songs, all supported by relevant advertising (think Google ads). You’ll need the Qtrax player to access the songs, which sadly is Windows only (Mac OS version to ship out on March 18th).

This isn’t the first time an ad-supported music model has given it a shot. SpiralFrog launched at the end of 2006. So far, they’ve had huge losses. The company who will sell advertising for Qtrax is actually founded by two ad execs who left SpiralFrog (says the NY Times).

Qtrax’s target audience are users of illegal file sharing networks. From the New York Times article:

Labels hope that the legitimacy and convenience of services like Qtrax will help them compete with unauthorized offerings. “We hope this service will draw from the illegal P-to-P sites,” said George White, senior vice president, Strategy and Product Development for Warner Music Group.

My projection: This won’t catch on. Ad supported models rely on mass use. Qtrax downloads require the Qtrax player and won’t work on an iPod. The first ad supported music that works will be wildly accessible, and the music will be just as easy to download and use as any given song from an illegal file-sharing network. Right now this model offers an enormous value proposition for the music industry, but not much for their target user.

Dear music industry: you can’t stop piracy from happening, but you can compete with it. It’s up to you to be competitive.

Update (1/29/08): I just read on TechCrunch that Qtrax pretty much botched the job (from “Qtrax really blows its launch“):

In what may be the dumbest business move of the year so far, Qtrax announced its free music download service this weekend before bothering to sign contracts with three of the four major labels. Now the music companies are saying, “Wait a second, there is no deal yet. We’re just talking to Qtrax.” Without the labels on board, there is no service.

C’est la vie.

The skinny on Creative Commons licensing

What with the whole share! discuss! community! open! freedom! nature of today’s web, the legal issues associated with borrowing, referencing, displaying, or quoting someone else’s work can sometimes get lost in the shuffle. Meanwhile, copyright law is such a complex tangled mess it can be really difficult to know what is and isn’t allowed, and how to make sure your work is protected while being accessible.

Fortunately for those of you us without legal degrees, content protection and the free flow of information have been necking since 2001, thanks to the Creative Commons.

Read on to learn about sharing like your momma taught you.

Some rights reserved

The Creative Commons allows you to choose just how many rights you’d like to reserve for your work by offering an assortment of licensing choices, ranging from relatively restrictive to an all out free-for-all.

Our content, as you may notice, is licensed as “Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5.” This basically means you can share this with whoever you want in whatever way you want, as long as you’re not hawking it (it’s a little more detailed, but that’s the gist).

The six main license types are listed and explained in-depth on their website. I should also mention that all licensing is free.

How legit is it?

Johnny Law gives it two thumbs up. Earlier this year, the first Creative Commons license was upheld in court .

And for those of you who put more stock in grunge music than Johnny Law, it’s also legitimate enough to have been used by Pearl Jam for their latest video release.

Sticking it to The Man

The point of this type of licensing is to allow the everyman to be able to easily share information, especially since a huge portion of information today is being created by the everyman.

According to Wikipedia, Creative Commons’ chairman of the board Lawrence Lessig feels that

”…modern culture is dominated by traditional content distributors in order to maintain and strengthen their monopolies on cultural products such as popular music and popular cinema, and that Creative Commons can provide alternatives to these restrictions.”

Now swipe this article in the name of freedom.

,

I design things.

Here's some stuff I've made. I hope you love it. If you're interested in working together, drop me a line and we'll chat.